State v. Mooney

924 P.2d 875, 143 Or. App. 624, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 1428
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided October 2, 1996·No. 94CR1309; CA A92682·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals the sentence that was imposed after his probation was revoked. He had initially pled guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, unauthorized use of a vehicle and criminal mischief in the first degree. On the charge of being a felon in possession of a firearm, the court had originally imposed a downward departure sentence of 36 months’ probation and then concurrent probation on the other two charges.

When defendant’s probation was revoked, the court sentenced him on the first charge to an enhanced penalty of five years’ imprisonment under ORS 161.610. The state concedes that the trial court erred in imposing a sentence under ORS 161.610. We agree.

Remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Mooney, 924 P.2d 875, 143 Or. App. 624, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 1428 (Or. Ct. App. 1996).

924 P.2d 875 (State v. Mooney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Allee
924 P.2d 875 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1996)