State v. Mooney
This text of 924 P.2d 875 (State v. Mooney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals the sentence that was imposed after his probation was revoked. He had initially pled guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, unauthorized use of a vehicle and criminal mischief in the first degree. On the charge of being a felon in possession of a firearm, the court had originally imposed a downward departure sentence of 36 months’ probation and then concurrent probation on the other two charges.
When defendant’s probation was revoked, the court sentenced him on the first charge to an enhanced penalty of five years’ imprisonment under ORS 161.610. The state concedes that the trial court erred in imposing a sentence under ORS 161.610. We agree.
Remanded for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
924 P.2d 875, 143 Or. App. 624, 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 1428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mooney-orctapp-1996.