State v. Montgomery

North Dakota Supreme Court

State v. Montgomery

2017 ND 268, 903 N.W.2d 720, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 275

CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 20, 2017

Docket20170170

StatusPublished

This text of 2017 ND 268 (State v. Montgomery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Montgomery, 2017 ND 268, 903 N.W.2d 720, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 275 (N.D. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Ron Montgomery appeals from a criminal judgment following a jury trial for violation of a disorderly conduct restraining order. Montgomery argues insufficient evidence existed to support the guilty verdict. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C. J. Daniel J. Crothers Jon J. Jensen Lisa Fair MeEvers Gary H. Lee, D.J. [¶ 3] The Honorable Gary H. Lee, D.J., sitting in place of Tufte, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Ron Montgomery appeals from a criminal judgment following a jury trial for violation of a disorderly conduct restraining order. Montgomery argues insufficient evidence existed to support the guilty verdict. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C. J. Daniel J. Crothers Jon J. Jensen Lisa Fair MeEvers Gary H. Lee, D.J. [¶ 3] The Honorable Gary H. Lee, D.J., sitting in place of Tufte, J., disqualified.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 ND 268, 903 N.W.2d 720, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-montgomery-nd-2017.