State v. Montgomery

100 S.W.3d 819, 2003 Mo. LEXIS 52, 2003 WL 1708229
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedApril 1, 2003
DocketNo. SC 85050
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 100 S.W.3d 819 (State v. Montgomery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Montgomery, 100 S.W.3d 819, 2003 Mo. LEXIS 52, 2003 WL 1708229 (Mo. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.1

Jerome Montgomery was convicted of first-degree burglary, section 569.160;2 first-degree robbery, section 569.202; second-degree assault, section 565.050; and armed criminal action, section 571.015. Montgomery claims the trial court erred when it allowed the State to make an improper comment during closing argument. He also argues there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction for second-degree assault and the armed criminal action count related to the second-degree assault.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. Rule 30.25(b).

The judgment is affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Montgomery v. State
165 S.W.3d 196 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 S.W.3d 819, 2003 Mo. LEXIS 52, 2003 WL 1708229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-montgomery-mo-2003.