State v. Montez

410 P.2d 764, 17 Utah 2d 299, 1966 Utah LEXIS 461
CourtUtah Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 9, 1966
DocketNo. 10454
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 410 P.2d 764 (State v. Montez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Montez, 410 P.2d 764, 17 Utah 2d 299, 1966 Utah LEXIS 461 (Utah 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The defendant was convicted of automobile homicide in the District Court of Salt Lake County. He was represented at .the trial by Mr. Jimi Mitsunaga, Public Defender, who took an appeal in his behalf. After reviewing the record, Mr. Mitsunaga reported to the court that he found no error upon which a reversal could reasonably be expected and requested to be relieved from further participation in the case. This request was granted and the defendant was notified to this effect and that if he desired to file his own brief, he could do so within 30 days, otherwise the appeal would be dismissed. This time having now expired and no brief of appellant having been filed this appeal is dismissed. _ ,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gallegos v. Turner
256 F. Supp. 670 (D. Utah, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
410 P.2d 764, 17 Utah 2d 299, 1966 Utah LEXIS 461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-montez-utah-1966.