State v. Montera

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Montera

199 So. 2d 534, 250 La. 753, 1967 La. LEXIS 2653

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 5, 1967

DocketNo. 48433

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 199 So. 2d 534 (State v. Montera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Montera, 199 So. 2d 534, 250 La. 753, 1967 La. LEXIS 2653 (La. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMERS, Justice.

Defendant was convicted and appealed. Pie made no appearance and filed no briefs in this Court, therefore, the bill of exceptions which was reserved is considered abandoned. State v. Brown, 245 La. 442, 158 So.2d 605 (1963); State v. Wessinger, 245 La. 409, 158 So.2d 594 (1963). The only question remaining under these circumstances is whether there are any errors patent on the face of the record. A review of the record discloses no error patent on the face of the record. Accordingly, the conviction and sentence are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMERS, Justice.

Defendant was convicted and appealed. Pie made no appearance and filed no briefs in this Court, therefore, the bill of exceptions which was reserved is considered abandoned. State v. Brown, 245 La. 442, 158 So.2d 605 (1963); State v. Wessinger, 245 La. 409, 158 So.2d 594 (1963). The only question remaining under these circumstances is whether there are any errors patent on the face of the record. A review of the record discloses no error patent on the face of the record. Accordingly, the conviction and sentence are affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 So. 2d 534, 250 La. 753, 1967 La. LEXIS 2653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-montera-la-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack