State v. Montano

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Montano

695 P.2d 928, 72 Or. App. 200, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 2706

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedFebruary 13, 1985

DocketM56178 A; CA A31256

StatusPublished

This text of 695 P.2d 928 (State v. Montano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Montano, 695 P.2d 928, 72 Or. App. 200, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 2706 (Or. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this criminal case, defendant appeals his conviction for assault in the fourth degree. On the merits, his conviction is affirmed. However, the sentence is vacated and the case is remanded for resentencing to allow the trial court to make an appropriate allocation of the victim’s losses between an automobile collision and the assault, and to consider the factors mandated by ORS 137.106(2).

Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

In this criminal case, defendant appeals his conviction for assault in the fourth degree. On the merits, his conviction is affirmed. However, the sentence is vacated and the case is remanded for resentencing to allow the trial court to make an appropriate allocation of the victim’s losses between an automobile collision and the assault, and to consider the factors mandated by ORS 137.106(2).

Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

695 P.2d 928, 72 Or. App. 200, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 2706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-montano-orctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack