State v. Montana

493 So. 2d 1205, 1986 La. LEXIS 7155
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedSeptember 26, 1986
DocketNo. 86-K-1135
StatusPublished

This text of 493 So. 2d 1205 (State v. Montana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Montana, 493 So. 2d 1205, 1986 La. LEXIS 7155 (La. 1986).

Opinion

In re Montana, Allison; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Number KA-4344; Parish of Orleans Criminal District Court Div. “I” Number 303-969.

Prior report: La.App., 489 So.2d 348.

Denied.

LEMMON, J., concurs.

When a defendant is brought into court in shackles, the trial judge errs if he allows the defendant to remain in shackles solely on the representation that the defendant had previously caused an unspecified disturbance and was considered to be “a possible security risk”. The judge’s failure to make a record of justification for the shackles would require reversal if the defendant had established on the record that defendant appeared before the jury in this condition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Montana
489 So. 2d 348 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
493 So. 2d 1205, 1986 La. LEXIS 7155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-montana-la-1986.