State v. Montague
This text of 13 S.C.L. 257 (State v. Montague) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court:
It is thought unnecessary to notice the several grounds taken in this case, on which the opinion of the court was delivered a few days since in the case of the State vs. Williams.
The grounds peculiar to this case, are,
1st. The refusal of the judge to permit the misnomer to be pleaded, and,
2ndly. The uncertainty of the verdict.
The defendant having pleaded the general issue, ■ and put himself upon his trial, it was too late (when the jury was charged) to interpose a new plea. On this ground, therefore,, the motion cannot succeed.
On the second ground, however, the motion must pretail. There are two distinct counts in the indictment, each charging the prisoner with a different and distinct offence. • For each of which offences, the law has provided a different and distinct punishment. A general verT diet of guilty, does not shew of which offence he was guilty. The judgment of the court, therefore, cannot be pronounced;
A new trial is ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 S.C.L. 257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-montague-sc-1822.