State v. Monrabal

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Monrabal

638 So. 2d 638, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6914, 1994 WL 330150

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 12, 1994

DocketNo. 94-00049

StatusPublished

This text of 638 So. 2d 638 (State v. Monrabal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Monrabal, 638 So. 2d 638, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6914, 1994 WL 330150 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court erred in failing to provide contemporaneous written reasons for imposing a downward departure sentence. Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla.1990), modified, State v. Lyles, 576 So.2d 706 (Fla.1991), and receded from in part, Smith v. State, 598 So.2d 1063 (Fla.1992). Accordingly, we reverse the defendant’s sentence and remand to allow the defendant to withdraw his plea.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court erred in failing to provide contemporaneous written reasons for imposing a downward departure sentence. Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329 (Fla.1990), modified, State v. Lyles, 576 So.2d 706 (Fla.1991), and receded from in part, Smith v. State, 598 So.2d 1063 (Fla.1992). Accordingly, we reverse the defendant’s sentence and remand to allow the defendant to withdraw his plea.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

638 So. 2d 638, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6914, 1994 WL 330150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-monrabal-fladistctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack