State v. Monk
331 S.W.3d 720, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 215, 2011 WL 588474
Opinion
ORDER
Arthur Monk appeals from the trial court’s judgment convicting him of robbery in the second degree after a bench trial. Monk contends that the trial court plainly erred in allowing Monk to represent himself because his waiver of counsel was not voluntary, unequivocal, knowing, and intelligent. In particular, Monk asserts that the trial court failed to determine whether Monk understood the nature of the charges asserted against him and his potential defenses. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Monk, 331 S.W.3d 720, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 215, 2011 WL 588474 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
331 S.W.3d 720 (State v. Monk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McCullough v. McCullough
331 S.W.3d 720 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)