State v. Moniz
This text of State v. Moniz (State v. Moniz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-13-0003064 27-JUL-2015 10:12 AM SCWC-13-0003064
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII ________________________________________________________________
STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant,
vs.
KENNETH A. MONIZ, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
_______________________________________________________________
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-13-0003064; CR. NO. 12-1-0176)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Kenneth A. Moniz’s application for writ of certiorari filed on June 15, 2015, is hereby accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, July 27, 2015. M. Kanani Laubach /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Kevin S. Hashizaki for respondent /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Moniz, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-moniz-haw-2015.