State v. Monigan

423 S.W.3d 308, 2014 WL 721196, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 180
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 25, 2014·No. No. ED 99482·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Alon Monigan (Defendant) appeals from the judgment of conviction entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis after a jury found him guilty of two counts of first-degree robbery, two counts of kidnapping, one count of attempted kidnapping, one count of second-degree assault, one count of misdemeanor resisting arrest, and three counts of armed criminal action. Defendant claims the trial court plainly erred in overruling his Batson1 challenge and in sentencing him on two of the armed criminal action counts to terms of imprisonment in excess of those authorized by law. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Monigan, 423 S.W.3d 308, 2014 WL 721196, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 180 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

423 S.W.3d 308 (State v. Monigan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Monigan v. Norman
E.D. Missouri, 2021