State v. MOI
This text of 261 P.3d 664 (State v. MOI) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Matthew MOI, aka Mathew Wilson Moi, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Washington.
ORDER
¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices C. Johnson, Chambers, Fairhurst and Stephens, considered at its September 26, 2011, Motion Calendar, whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.
¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:
¶ 3 That the Petition for Review is granted only on the issue of the right to be present at trial and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals Division One for reconsideration in light of State of Washington v. Terrance Jon Irby, 170 Wash.2d 874, 246 P.3d 796 (2011).
For the Court
/s/ Madsen, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICEFree access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
261 P.3d 664, 172 Wash. 2d 1014, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-moi-wash-2011.