State v. MOHRMAN

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. MOHRMAN

190 S.W.3d 446, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 363, 2006 WL 770437

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 28, 2006·No. ED 85400·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Ronda Mohrman, appeals from the judgment entered on her conviction by a jury of unlawful use of drug paraphernalia, Section 195.233 RSMo 2000, and attempt to commit theft of anhydrous ammonia, Section 570.030.4 RSMo 2000. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no error. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

*447 We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Ronda Mohrman, appeals from the judgment entered on her conviction by a jury of unlawful use of drug paraphernalia, Section 195.233 RSMo 2000, and attempt to commit theft of anhydrous ammonia, Section 570.030.4 RSMo 2000. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no error. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

*447 We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. MOHRMAN, 190 S.W.3d 446, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 363, 2006 WL 770437 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

190 S.W.3d 446 (State v. MOHRMAN) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.