State v. Moen
This text of 791 P.2d 503 (State v. Moen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals his conviction for assault in the second degree on the ground that the trial court did not orally give him all of the advice required by ORS 135.385(2) before accepting his guilty plea. He argues that the court’s error, in effect, nullified his conviction, making the voluntariness of his guilty plea an appealable issue. That issue was decided adversely to defendant in State v. Clevenger, 297 Or 234, 683 P2d 1360 (1984).
Defendant also challenges the length of his sentence, arguing that the trial court sentenced him “on the basis of past crimes and unprosecuted crimes.” That contention has no merit.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
791 P.2d 503, 101 Or. App. 516, 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-moen-orctapp-1990.