Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. Modeen

State v. Modeen

502 N.E.2d 634, 28 Ohio St. 3d 64, 28 Ohio B. 164, 1986 Ohio LEXIS 794
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 24, 1986
DocketNo. 86-1148
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 502 N.E.2d 634 (State v. Modeen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Modeen, 502 N.E.2d 634, 28 Ohio St. 3d 64, 28 Ohio B. 164, 1986 Ohio LEXIS 794 (Ohio 1986).

Opinion

[65]*65The judgment in this cause (case Nos. 85AP-907 and 85AP-908) has been certified to this court as being in conflict with the judgment of the court in State v. Meadows (Dec. 18, 1985), Hamilton App. No. C-850091, unreported, on the following issue: “Does the First Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibit the state of Ohio from enacting a criminal statute which prohibits the private possession of child pornography?”

Based on State v. Meadows (1986), 28 Ohio St. 3d 43, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Celebrezze, C.J., Locher, Holmes, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur. Sweeney, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Savery v. State
782 S.W.2d 321 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1990)
State v. Young
525 N.E.2d 1363 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
502 N.E.2d 634, 28 Ohio St. 3d 64, 28 Ohio B. 164, 1986 Ohio LEXIS 794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-modeen-ohio-1986.