State v. Modeen

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Modeen

502 N.E.2d 634, 28 Ohio St. 3d 64, 28 Ohio B. 164, 1986 Ohio LEXIS 794

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 24, 1986·No. No. 86-1148·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

[65]*65The judgment in this cause (case Nos. 85AP-907 and 85AP-908) has been certified to this court as being in conflict with the judgment of the court in State v. Meadows (Dec. 18, 1985), Hamilton App. No. C-850091, unreported, on the following issue: “Does the First Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibit the state of Ohio from enacting a criminal statute which prohibits the private possession of child pornography?”

Based on State v. Meadows (1986), 28 Ohio St. 3d 43, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Celebrezze, C.J., Locher, Holmes, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur. Sweeney, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[65]*65The judgment in this cause (case Nos. 85AP-907 and 85AP-908) has been certified to this court as being in conflict with the judgment of the court in State v. Meadows (Dec. 18, 1985), Hamilton App. No. C-850091, unreported, on the following issue: “Does the First Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibit the state of Ohio from enacting a criminal statute which prohibits the private possession of child pornography?”

Based on State v. Meadows (1986), 28 Ohio St. 3d 43, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Celebrezze, C.J., Locher, Holmes, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur. Sweeney, J., not participating.

State v. Modeen, 502 N.E.2d 634, 28 Ohio St. 3d 64, 28 Ohio B. 164, 1986 Ohio LEXIS 794 (Ohio 1986).

Pincite

502 N.E.2d 634 (State v. Modeen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related