State v. Mock

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Mock

679 P.2d 330, 67 Or. App. 532, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3021

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedApril 4, 1984

Docket82-1540-C; CA A29690

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 679 P.2d 330 (State v. Mock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Mock, 679 P.2d 330, 67 Or. App. 532, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3021 (Or. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted of felony driving while suspended. ORS 487.560. On August 23,1983, defendant was placed on five-years probation, as a condition of which he was ordered to serve one year in the Josephine County Jail. The jail time was to be served consecutive to a five-year unrelated prison sentence, which had four years and 11 months remaining at the time of disposition of this case.

Defendant contends and the state concedes that defendant’s sentence is improper, because it maybe more than five years from the date of disposition of this case before he completes the one-year county jail term. See ORS 137.010; State v. Maddox, 29 Or App 787, 789, 564 P2d 1372, rev den 280 Or 171 (1977). We therefore modify the trial court order so that defendant’s probationary period, including any remaining jail time, shall end on August 23, 1988.

Order modified so that defendant’s probationary period, including any unexpired jail time, shall end on August 23,1988.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted of felony driving while suspended. ORS 487.560. On August 23,1983, defendant was placed on five-years probation, as a condition of which he was ordered to serve one year in the Josephine County Jail. The jail time was to be served consecutive to a five-year unrelated prison sentence, which had four years and 11 months remaining at the time of disposition of this case.

Defendant contends and the state concedes that defendant’s sentence is improper, because it maybe more than five years from the date of disposition of this case before he completes the one-year county jail term. See ORS 137.010; State v. Maddox, 29 Or App 787, 789, 564 P2d 1372, rev den 280 Or 171 (1977). We therefore modify the trial court order so that defendant’s probationary period, including any remaining jail time, shall end on August 23, 1988.

Order modified so that defendant’s probationary period, including any unexpired jail time, shall end on August 23,1988.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

679 P.2d 330, 67 Or. App. 532, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mock-orctapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack