State v. M.M.
896 A.2d 454, 186 N.J. 430, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 11
This text of 896 A.2d 454 (State v. M.M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. M.M., 896 A.2d 454, 186 N.J. 430, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 11 (N.J. 2006).
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Parker’s opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 377 N.J.Super. 71, 871 A.2d 707 (2005).
For affirmance—Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices LONG, LaVECCHIA, ZAZZALI, ALBIN, WALLACE and RIVERA-SOTO—7.
Opposed—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In the Matter of Commitment of Mm
896 A.2d 454 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
896 A.2d 454, 186 N.J. 430, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mm-nj-2006.