State v. M.M.
896 A.2d 454, 186 N.J. 430, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 11
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Parker’s opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 377 N.J.Super. 71, 871 A.2d 707 (2005).
For affirmance—Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices LONG, LaVECCHIA, ZAZZALI, ALBIN, WALLACE and RIVERA-SOTO—7.
Opposed—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. M.M., 896 A.2d 454, 186 N.J. 430, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 11 (N.J. 2006).
896 A.2d 454 (State v. M.M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In the Matter of Commitment of Mm
896 A.2d 454 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2006)