State v. Mitchell State Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

State v. Mitchell State Bank

242 N.W. 283, 123 Neb. 120, 1932 Neb. LEXIS 169

Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided April 16, 1932·No. No. 28196; No. 28197; No. 28198; No. 28199; No. 28203; No. 28204·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Rose, J.

In each of the above entitled cases the district court overruled the application of E. H. Luikart, secretary of the department of trade and commerce, to be appointed receiver, and appointed A. E. Torgeson to succeed Clarence G. Bliss, resigned. Luikart appealed. For reasons stated in the opinion in State v. State Bank of Minatare, ante, p. 109, submitted with these cases, the judgments of the district courts are

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rose, J.

In each of the above entitled cases the district court overruled the application of E. H. Luikart, secretary of the department of trade and commerce, to be appointed receiver, and appointed A. E. Torgeson to succeed Clarence G. Bliss, resigned. Luikart appealed. For reasons stated in the opinion in State v. State Bank of Minatare, ante, p. 109, submitted with these cases, the judgments of the district courts are

Affirmed.

State v. Mitchell State Bank, 242 N.W. 283, 123 Neb. 120, 1932 Neb. LEXIS 169 (Neb. 1932).

Pincite

242 N.W. 283 (State v. Mitchell State Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related