State v. Mitchell
This text of 396 P.2d 572 (State v. Mitchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for the crime of first degree murder. Defendant was sentenced to death, the jury not having recommended life imprisonment. Oregon Constitution, Art I, § 37.
Defendant was charged with killing Dmitre Yerkovich in a movie theater in Klamath Falls. Yerkovich had escorted defendant’s former wife to the theater. Defendant entered the theater, approached his victim from behind, and shot him without warning. Defendant pleaded not guilty and gave notice of intent to rely upon insanity as a defense.
The principal assignment of error is directed at an instruction which could have been interpreted by the jury to mean that if it made no recommendation for a life sentence, the trial judge would have the power to so limit the sentence.
After this appeal was filed Governor Mark Hatfield commuted defendant’s sentence to life imprisonment. Under these circumstances the question raised by this assignment of error is moot.
Defendant also assigns as error the trial court’s refusal to give certain requested instructions relating to the defense of insanity. The instructions given adequately stated the law as it applied to defendant’s theory of the case.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
396 P.2d 572, 239 Or. 87, 1964 Ore. LEXIS 488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mitchell-or-1964.