State v. Mitchell

883 S.W.2d 58, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1249, 1994 WL 395465
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Mitchell. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 786
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 2, 1994·No. Nos. 63865, 65180·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for second degree robbery, § 569.080, RSMo 1986. He was sentenced by the court as a prior and persistent offender to a twelve year prison term. He also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Mitchell, 883 S.W.2d 58, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1249, 1994 WL 395465 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

883 S.W.2d 58 (State v. Mitchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.