State v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Mitchell

290 N.W. 222, 207 Minn. 55

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided January 26, 1940·No. No. 32,258.·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant was charged with disorderly conduct consisting of indecent exposure. He was found guilty. A recital of the facts would not be a benefit to the defendant or the bench and bar. It is sufficient to state that the question was essentially one of *56 identity of defendant as the guilty person. We have carefully read and considered the entire record and are satisfied that the lower court had a sufficient basis in the testimony to find that defendant was guilty. The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant was charged with disorderly conduct consisting of indecent exposure. He was found guilty. A recital of the facts would not be a benefit to the defendant or the bench and bar. It is sufficient to state that the question was essentially one of *56 identity of defendant as the guilty person. We have carefully read and considered the entire record and are satisfied that the lower court had a sufficient basis in the testimony to find that defendant was guilty. The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

State v. Mitchell, 290 N.W. 222, 207 Minn. 55 (Mich. 1940).

Pincite

290 N.W. 222 (State v. Mitchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related