State v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Mitchell

290 N.W. 222, 207 Minn. 55

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJanuary 26, 1940

DocketNo. 32,258.

StatusPublished

This text of 290 N.W. 222 (State v. Mitchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Mitchell, 290 N.W. 222, 207 Minn. 55 (Mich. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant was charged with disorderly conduct consisting of indecent exposure. He was found guilty. A recital of the facts would not be a benefit to the defendant or the bench and bar. It is sufficient to state that the question was essentially one of *56 identity of defendant as the guilty person. We have carefully read and considered the entire record and are satisfied that the lower court had a sufficient basis in the testimony to find that defendant was guilty. The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant was charged with disorderly conduct consisting of indecent exposure. He was found guilty. A recital of the facts would not be a benefit to the defendant or the bench and bar. It is sufficient to state that the question was essentially one of *56 identity of defendant as the guilty person. We have carefully read and considered the entire record and are satisfied that the lower court had a sufficient basis in the testimony to find that defendant was guilty. The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

290 N.W. 222, 207 Minn. 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mitchell-minn-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack