State v. Mitchell

673 So. 2d 616, 1996 La. LEXIS 1422, 1996 WL 279902

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Mitchell. Read the opinion of the Court — 674 So. 2d 250 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 17, 1996·No. No. 96-KK-1245·Published

Opinion

In re Mitchell, David Lee; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KW96-0478; Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court, Div. “F”, No. 241,803.

Granted. The ruling of the court of appeal is set aside, and the ruling of the trial court is reinstated.

MARCUS and BLEICH, JJ., would deny the application. WATSON, J., would deny the application on the showing. JOHNSON, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Granted. The ruling of the court of appeal is set aside, and the ruling of the trial court is reinstated.

MARCUS and BLEICH, JJ., would deny the application. WATSON, J., would deny the application on the showing. JOHNSON, J., not on panel.

State v. Mitchell, 673 So. 2d 616, 1996 La. LEXIS 1422, 1996 WL 279902 (La. 1996).

Pincite

673 So. 2d 616 (State v. Mitchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.