State v. Mitchell
666 So. 2d 955, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 45, 1996 WL 1736
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Mitchell. Read the opinion of the Court — 719 So. 2d 1245 →
Opinions
We find that the evidence presented by the state failed to establish that appellee knowingly made false statements in writing with the intent to mislead a public servant. We, therefore, affirm the trial court’s order granting appellee’s renewed motion for judgment of acquittal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Mitchell, 666 So. 2d 955, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 45, 1996 WL 1736 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
666 So. 2d 955 (State v. Mitchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Norris
384 So. 2d 298 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
State, Dept. of Agriculture v. Quick Cash of Tallahasee, Inc.
609 So. 2d 735 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Steele v. State
561 So. 2d 638 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
State v. Law
559 So. 2d 187 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)