State v. Mitchell
This text of 957 A.2d 874 (State v. Mitchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Philip MITCHELL.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
James M. Ralls, senior assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.
Charles F. Willson, special public defender, in opposition.
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 108 Conn.App. 388, 948 A.2d 335 (2008), is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant's statement was admitted in violation of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), and if so, was this harmful error requiring a new trial?"
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18219.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
957 A.2d 874, 289 Conn. 904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mitchell-conn-2008.