State v. Mitchell

957 A.2d 874, 289 Conn. 904
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 5, 2008·No. 18219·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

957 A.2d 874 (2008)
289 Conn. 904

STATE of Connecticut
v.
Philip MITCHELL.

No. 18219.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided September 5, 2008.

James M. Ralls, senior assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.

Charles F. Willson, special public defender, in opposition.

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 108 Conn.App. 388, 948 A.2d 335 (2008), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant's statement was admitted in violation of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), and if so, was this harmful error requiring a new trial?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18219.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Mitchell, 957 A.2d 874, 289 Conn. 904 (Colo. 2008).

957 A.2d 874 (State v. Mitchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Mitchell
996 A.2d 251 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2010)