State v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.

147 S.W. 130, 242 Mo. 380, 1912 Mo. LEXIS 26
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided May 7, 1912·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BROWN, J.

The issues involved in this appeal are precisely the same as those adjudicated by this [381]*381court in Banc at the present term in the case entitled State of Missouri v. Missouri Pacific Railway Company, 242 Mo. 339, except that in the instant case the defendant is a corporation organized under the laws of Kansas, instead of the laws of Missouri.

' Defendant’s learned counsel has not called our attention to any law or reason why the semi-monthly payment law should not apply with equal force to foreign and domestic corporations when the former are licensed to and are transacting business in this State.

Being satisfied .that under the provisions of section 3037, Revised Statutes 1909, said semi-monthly payment law does apply to both domestic and foreign corporations, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co., 147 S.W. 130, 242 Mo. 380, 1912 Mo. LEXIS 26 (Mo. 1912).

147 S.W. 130 (State v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. J. B. & R. E. Walker, Inc.
116 P.2d 766 (Utah Supreme Court, 1941)