State v. MISRA

202 S.W.3d 35, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1376, 2006 WL 2671056
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 19, 2006·No. ED 86850·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of second-degree assault, in violation of section 565.060 RSMo (2000), and armed criminal action, in violation of section 571.015 RSMo (2000), arising out of a stab *36 bing. The jury assessed a sentence of one day in the county jail on the assault count and three years imprisonment on the armed criminal action count, and the trial court sentenced defendant to serve these terms concurrently.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. MISRA, 202 S.W.3d 35, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1376, 2006 WL 2671056 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

202 S.W.3d 35 (State v. MISRA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. State
202 S.W.3d 35 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006)