State v. Misikin

118 P.3d 835, 201 Or. App. 412, 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 1148
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided August 31, 2005·No. 025876; A122361·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. State v. Vigil, 197 Or App 407, 106 P3d 656, adh’d to on recons, 199 Or App 525, 112 P3d 441, rev den, 339 Or 156 (2005); State v. Fuerte-Coria, 196 Or App 170, 100 P3d 773 (2004), rev den, 338 Or 16 (2005); State v. McCoin, 190 Or App 532, 79 P3d 342 (2003), rev den, 336 Or 422 (2004).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Misikin, 118 P.3d 835, 201 Or. App. 412, 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 1148 (Or. Ct. App. 2005).

118 P.3d 835 (State v. Misikin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Vigil
106 P.3d 656 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2005)
State v. McCoin
79 P.3d 342 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2003)
Jordan v. SAIF Corp.
119 P.3d 224 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2005)
State v. Fuerte-Coria
100 P.3d 773 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2004)
State v. Vigil
112 P.3d 441 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2005)