State v. Minkel
This text of 192 N.W.2d 420 (State v. Minkel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for the offense of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, Minn. St. 609.55, subd. 2. His claims that the court improperly accepted his plea of guilty and that he was inadequately represented by appointed counsel are without merit. Defendant’s claim that the trial court improperly revoked an initial stay of the imposition of sentence and imposed a sentence of confinement to the State Prison without affording him an opportunity to offer evidence on the issue of whether he had violated the conditions of the stay is moot inasmuch as he has been released from confinement upon modified parole effective October 6, 1971.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
192 N.W.2d 420, 291 Minn. 554, 1971 Minn. LEXIS 1086, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-minkel-minn-1971.