State v. Mink
This text of 196 S.E.2d 552 (State v. Mink) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The warrant upon which defendant was tried in the District Court and upon which he was tried in the Superior Court is insufficient to charge an offense. It fails to allege the duty of his office that the public officer was discharging or attempting to discharge. For this reason it fails to allege an offense under either G.S. 14-33 (c) (4) or G.S. 14-223. See State v. *347 Wiggs, 269 N.C. 507, 512, 153 S.E. 2d 84, 88; State v. Smith, 262 N.C. 472, 474, 137 S.E. 2d 819, 820.
Judgment arrested.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
196 S.E.2d 552, 18 N.C. App. 346, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mink-ncctapp-1973.