State v. Mingo

622 A.2d 1294, 132 N.J. 75, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 70
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedApril 8, 1993
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 622 A.2d 1294 (State v. Mingo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Mingo, 622 A.2d 1294, 132 N.J. 75, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 70 (N.J. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge D’Annunzio’s dissenting opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 263 N.J.Super. 296, 622 A.2d 1306 (1992).

For reversal — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.

For affirmance — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
622 A.2d 1294, 132 N.J. 75, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 70, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mingo-nj-1993.