State v. Mingo

622 A.2d 1294, 132 N.J. 75, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 70

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge D’Annunzio’s dissenting opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 263 N.J.Super. 296, 622 A.2d 1306 (1992).

For reversal — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.

For affirmance — None.