State v. Mims
175 S.W.3d 208, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1963, 2005 WL 2851576
Opinion
ORDER
Oscar Mims appeals the judgment entered on his conviction for trafficking in the second degree.
We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no error. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have, however, been provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision in accordance with our local Rule 405. The judgment is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Mims, 175 S.W.3d 208, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1963, 2005 WL 2851576 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).
175 S.W.3d 208 (State v. Mims) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mims v. State
226 S.W.3d 241 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)