Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/State v. Milotte

State v. Milotte

901 A.2d 1228, 279 Conn. 906, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 271
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJune 29, 2006
DocketSC 17695
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 901 A.2d 1228 (State v. Milotte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Milotte, 901 A.2d 1228, 279 Conn. 906, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 271 (Colo. 2006).

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 95 Conn. App. 616 (AC 26217), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the trial court properly granted the defendant-appellee’s motion to suppress evidence resulting from a warrantless investigatory stop of his vehicle, on the ground that the police officer lacked a reasonable and articulable suspicion of criminal activity to justify the stop?”

Martin Zeldis, public defender, in opposition. Decided June 29, 2006

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Milotte
917 A.2d 25 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
901 A.2d 1228, 279 Conn. 906, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-milotte-conn-2006.