State v. Milotte

901 A.2d 1228, 279 Conn. 906, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 271
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 29, 2006·No. SC 17695·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 95 Conn. App. 616 (AC 26217), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the trial court properly granted the defendant-appellee’s motion to suppress evidence resulting from a warrantless investigatory stop of his vehicle, on the ground that the police officer lacked a reasonable and articulable suspicion of criminal activity to justify the stop?”

Martin Zeldis, public defender, in opposition. Decided June 29, 2006

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Milotte, 901 A.2d 1228, 279 Conn. 906, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 271 (Colo. 2006).

901 A.2d 1228 (State v. Milotte) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Milotte
917 A.2d 25 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2007)