State v. Millsapp

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Millsapp

534 S.W.3d 306

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 12, 2017

DocketNO. ED 104589

StatusPublished

This text of 534 S.W.3d 306 (State v. Millsapp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Millsapp, 534 S.W.3d 306 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

"PER CURIAM

Albert Millsapp appeals the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury convicted him of felony murder, first-degree robbery, and possession of a controlled substance. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law.' No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed hi accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

"PER CURIAM

Albert Millsapp appeals the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury convicted him of felony murder, first-degree robbery, and possession of a controlled substance. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law.' No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed hi accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

534 S.W.3d 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-millsapp-moctapp-2017.