State v. Mills

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Mills

516 S.W.3d 453, 2017 WL 1485562, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 327

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 25, 2017·No. No. ED 103594·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Darren R. Mills (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment convicting him of two counts of statutory sodomy in the first degree, in violation of Section 566.062 (RSMo Cum. Supp. 2013). The Circuit Court of Lincoln County sentenced Appellant to consecutive sentences of life in prison, after jurors returned verdicts finding Appellant guilty of both offenses.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Darren R. Mills (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment convicting him of two counts of statutory sodomy in the first degree, in violation of Section 566.062 (RSMo Cum. Supp. 2013). The Circuit Court of Lincoln County sentenced Appellant to consecutive sentences of life in prison, after jurors returned verdicts finding Appellant guilty of both offenses.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Mills, 516 S.W.3d 453, 2017 WL 1485562, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 327 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

516 S.W.3d 453 (State v. Mills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.