State v. Mills

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Mills

516 S.W.3d 453, 2017 WL 1485562, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 327

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 25, 2017

DocketNo. ED 103594

StatusPublished

This text of 516 S.W.3d 453 (State v. Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Mills, 516 S.W.3d 453, 2017 WL 1485562, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 327 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Darren R. Mills (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment convicting him of two counts of statutory sodomy in the first degree, in violation of Section 566.062 (RSMo Cum. Supp. 2013). The Circuit Court of Lincoln County sentenced Appellant to consecutive sentences of life in prison, after jurors returned verdicts finding Appellant guilty of both offenses.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Darren R. Mills (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment convicting him of two counts of statutory sodomy in the first degree, in violation of Section 566.062 (RSMo Cum. Supp. 2013). The Circuit Court of Lincoln County sentenced Appellant to consecutive sentences of life in prison, after jurors returned verdicts finding Appellant guilty of both offenses.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

516 S.W.3d 453, 2017 WL 1485562, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mills-moctapp-2017.