State v. Mills

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Mills

473 S.W.3d 238, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1088, 2015 WL 6472488

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 27, 2015

DocketED 101662

StatusPublished

This text of 473 S.W.3d 238 (State v. Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Mills, 473 S.W.3d 238, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1088, 2015 WL 6472488 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Mills appeals his conviction and sentence for two counts of possession of child pornography.. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record' on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only.- We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b) (2015).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Mills appeals his conviction and sentence for two counts of possession of child pornography.. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record' on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only.- We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b) (2015).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

473 S.W.3d 238, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1088, 2015 WL 6472488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mills-moctapp-2015.