State v. Mills

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Mills

473 S.W.3d 238, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1088, 2015 WL 6472488

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 27, 2015·No. ED 101662·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Mills appeals his conviction and sentence for two counts of possession of child pornography.. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record' on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only.- We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b) (2015).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Mills appeals his conviction and sentence for two counts of possession of child pornography.. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record' on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only.- We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b) (2015).

State v. Mills, 473 S.W.3d 238, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1088, 2015 WL 6472488 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

473 S.W.3d 238 (State v. Mills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.