State v. Mills

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

State v. Mills

505 A.2d 1330

DecidedMarch 25, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 505 A.2d 1330 (State v. Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Mills, 505 A.2d 1330 (Me. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Leo T. Mills appeals his conviction in Superior Court, Waldo County, of operating under the influence of intoxicating liquor, 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-B. Mills contends that the court improperly denied his motion to suppress evidence gathered as a result of the stop of his vehicle. We conclude that the court applied the proper legal standard to the evidence presented and .that the evidence was sufficient to justify the court’s decision. See State v. Chapman, 495 A.2d 314, 317 (Me.1985).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Leo T. Mills appeals his conviction in Superior Court, Waldo County, of operating under the influence of intoxicating liquor, 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-B. Mills contends that the court improperly denied his motion to suppress evidence gathered as a result of the stop of his vehicle. We conclude that the court applied the proper legal standard to the evidence presented and .that the evidence was sufficient to justify the court’s decision. See State v. Chapman, 495 A.2d 314, 317 (Me.1985).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

505 A.2d 1330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mills-me-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack