State v. Mills

57 A.2d 99, 44 Del. 125, 5 Terry 125, 1947 Del. Super. LEXIS 66
CourtSupreme Court of Delaware
DecidedAugust 7, 1947
DocketNo. 2
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 57 A.2d 99 (State v. Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Mills, 57 A.2d 99, 44 Del. 125, 5 Terry 125, 1947 Del. Super. LEXIS 66 (Del. 1947).

Opinion

Richards, C. J.:

The Act incorporating the City of Rehoboth Beach and establishing a charter therefor, as amended, provides, inter alla, that the Commissioners of Rehoboth shall consist of seven members to be chosen as therein provided; That one of said Commissioners shall have the title of Mayor of Rehoboth and shall also be President of The Commissioners of Rehoboth; That each of said seven Commissioners of Rehoboth shall at the time of his election, and during his term of office, be a freeholder of the City; That his ceasing to be a freeholder of the City shall ipso facto, vacate his office; That each of three of said Commissioners shall also reside within the corporate limits of the City of Rehoboth Beach; That the Commissioner with the title of Mayor of Rehoboth and President of the Commissioners of Rehoboth shall be a bona fide resident of the City of Rehoboth Beach; that removal from the corporate limits of the City of Rehoboth Beach of any Commissioner required to be a resident of the City of Rehoboth Beach, shall ipso facto, vacate his office; That removal of his domicile from the City of Rehoboth Beach by the Commissioner with the title of Mayor of Rehoboth and President of the Commissioners of Reho[129]*129both, required to be a bona fide resident of the City of Rehoboth Beach, shall ipso facto, vacate his office; That if at any one time more than three incumbents of the office of Commissioner shall not reside in said City by reason of one or more of them removing from said City, in such event, the Commissioner last removing from said City, shall ipso facto, vacate his office; Section 3, Chapter 161, Volume 41, Laws of Delaware; Sections 1, 2, 3, Chapter 177, Volume 43, Laws of Delaware.

Section 5, of said Charter provides, that the six offices of Commissioner of Rehoboth and the one office of Commissioner of Rehoboth with the title of Mayor of Rehoboth who shall also be President of the Commissioners of Rehoboth, shall be elective; That the six offices of Commissioner of Rehoboth shall be for a term of two years, and the office of Commissioner of Rehoboth with the title of Mayor of Rehoboth and who shall also be President of the Commissioners of Rehoboth shall be for a one year term.

Section 6 of said charter prescribes the mode of nominating candidates for the elective offices above referred to, providing that the Commissioners of Rehoboth shall sit in open meeting to judge of the qualification of the candidates so nominated, setting forth a form of nomination petition to be used, which must be accompanied by an affidavit made by the person by whom it was circulated, attesting to the genuineness of the signatures of persons whose names appear thereon.

Section 7 of said charter, as amended, provides for the annual election of the Commissioners to be held on the second Saturday in the month of August, at such public place as shall be designated by the Commissioners, notice of which is required to be posted in five of the most public places within the corporate limits of the City of Rehoboth Beach not less than ten days before the day of such annual [130]*130election. This section further provides for an Election Board to hold said election, the method of voting, those who shall be entitled to vote at said election, the course to be followed in counting the votes followed by the provision that the persons declared by the Election Board to be elected shall continue in office during the terms for which they were chosen, or until their successors are duly elected or appointed and qualified.

Charles Mills and James A. Campbell, Jr., were elected Commissioners of Rehoboth for a term of two years at the annual election held on August 11, 1949, and William L. Rickards and James Travis were elected Commissioners of Rehoboth, for a term of two years at the annual election held on August 10, 1946. All of the formalities prescribed by the charter with respect to the election of Commissioners were complied with, namely, the form of nominating petition and the affidavit made by the person who circulated it, the approval of the qualification of the candidates by the Commissioners of Rehoboth in open meeting, the place and time of holding the election, the Election Board by which the election was held, the method of voting, the qualification of the voters and the course to be followed in counting the votes. Following said elections the said Charles Mills, James A. Campbell, Jr., William L. Rickards and James Travis, were duly declared by the Election Board as having been elected Commissioners of Rehoboth. It is undoubtedly true said Commissioners would have been entitled to serve until the expiration of the two year term for which they were elected, and would have been entitled to continue in office until their respective successors were elected or appointed and qualified, if the charter of the City of Rehoboth Beach had not been amended by the passage of Section 2 of House Substitute for House Bill No. 197 by the Legislature, 46 Del. Laws, c. 243.

[131]*131This brings us to the real question before us for consideration, are all of the defendants lawfully and rightfully entitled to exercise the franchises, liberties, privileges, rights, duties and functions, and enjoy the emoluments of the respective offices of Commissioner of Rehoboth for the remainder of the respective terms for which they were elected?

The Charter of the City of Rehoboth Beach contains many provisions which are not found in the charter of other municipal corporations. The Legislature apparently recognized that a large portion of the real estate within the corporate limits was owned by persons who were not residents of the City, and permitted privileges to be granted which were intended for their benefit.

It was argued that section 10 of House Substitute for House Bill number 197, being Chapter 243, of Volume 46 of the Laws of Delaware, shows that the Legislature intended that section 2 of said Act should go into effect immediately upon its approval by the Governor, which intent is defeated as long as all of the defendants continue to occupy the offices of Commissioner of Rehoboth; also that the defendants have no vested right to occupy the office of Commissioner of Rehoboth, and should not be allowed to defeat the purpose and intent of the Act by continuing to hold said office; and further argued that said section 2 of House Substitute for House Bill Number 197, being an amendment of section 3 of the Charter of the City of Rehoboth Beach presumed a change in the legal rights of the defendants to occupy the office of Commissioner of Rehoboth.

The main question for determination in this case, is what was the intention of the Legislature when it enacted the 1947 amendment to the Charter of the City of Rehoboth Beach. Various methods have been adopted for determining [132]*132what the legislative intention was but no single method has been found to give a certain answer to the question. It may involve the exercise of judgment the method of arriving at which is difficult to express. Sutherland Statutory Construction, Vol. 2, Section 4501.

In order to hold that the Legislature intended that the amendment should take effect immediately and vacate any of the offices of Commissioner of Rehoboth to which the defendants were duly elected, it is necessary to give it a retroactive effect. A retroactive law is one which takes away rights acquired under existing laws, creates a new obligation or imposes a new duty with respect to past events.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kindle Building Co. v. Ford Motor Co.
17 F. Supp. 2d 701 (N.D. Ohio, 1997)
Bash v. Board of Medical Practice
579 A.2d 1145 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1989)
Whaley v. Allstate Insurance
595 F. Supp. 1023 (D. Delaware, 1984)
Rennick v. Glasgow Realty, Inc.
510 F. Supp. 638 (D. Delaware, 1981)
Fraternal Order of Police Youngstown Lodge No. 28 v. Hunter
360 N.E.2d 708 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1975)
Fraternal Order of Police v. Hunter
303 N.E.2d 103 (Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 A.2d 99, 44 Del. 125, 5 Terry 125, 1947 Del. Super. LEXIS 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mills-del-1947.