State v. Mills

19 Ark. 476
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedJanuary 15, 1858
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 19 Ark. 476 (State v. Mills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Mills, 19 Ark. 476 (Ark. 1858).

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice English

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Mills was indicted in the Van Burén Circuit Court for an assault and battery. He pleaded not guilty, and was put upon his trial. After the evidence was introduced, and the case submitted to the jury, the Court took a recess for dinner. Before the Court met again, the jury returned to the clerk a verdict of not guilty, which he received, and the jury were “ dismissed by the sheriff,” says the bill of exceptions, and permitted to disperse.

After the Court met, the prosecuting attorney filed a motion to set aside the verdict, because it was delivered to the clerk in the recess of the Court, without the direction of the Court, or consent of parties: the Court overruled the motion, and rendered judgment upon the verdict, discharging the defendant. The prosecuting attorney excepted and appealed.

The verdict was of no validity until delivered, by the jury, in Court. The clerk had no authority to receive it. 1 Bacon Abr., Title, Verdict, letter B; 3 Johnson Rep. 255; 1 Johns. Cases 308; 7 John. R. 32; 6 Ib. 68.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded with instructions to the Court to set aside the verdict, and award a venire de novo.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blueford v. Arkansas
132 S. Ct. 2044 (Supreme Court, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 Ark. 476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mills-ark-1858.