State v. Milligan

725 P.2d 1299, 81 Or. App. 525
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedOctober 8, 1986
DocketCR 83-475; CA A36635
StatusPublished

This text of 725 P.2d 1299 (State v. Milligan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Milligan, 725 P.2d 1299, 81 Or. App. 525 (Or. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

VAN HOOMISSEN, J.,

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in State v. Westlund, 75 Or App 43, 53, 705 P2d 208, rev allowed 300 Or 332 (1985). Further, in my opinion, State v. Langevin, 78 Or App 311, 715 P2d 1355 (1986), is an unwarranted extension of Westlund.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Westlund
705 P.2d 208 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1985)
State v. Langevin
715 P.2d 1355 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
725 P.2d 1299, 81 Or. App. 525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-milligan-orctapp-1986.