State v. Milligan

725 P.2d 1299, 81 Or. App. 525
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided October 8, 1986·No. CR 83-475; CA A36635·Published

Opinion

VAN HOOMISSEN, J.,

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in State v. Westlund, 75 Or App 43, 53, 705 P2d 208, rev allowed 300 Or 332 (1985). Further, in my opinion, State v. Langevin, 78 Or App 311, 715 P2d 1355 (1986), is an unwarranted extension of Westlund.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Milligan, 725 P.2d 1299, 81 Or. App. 525 (Or. Ct. App. 1986).

725 P.2d 1299 (State v. Milligan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Westlund
705 P.2d 208 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1985)
State v. Langevin
715 P.2d 1355 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1986)