State v. Miller

Wisconsin Supreme Court

State v. Miller

2000 WI 44, 610 N.W.2d 484, 234 Wis. 2d 687, 2000 Wisc. LEXIS 224

CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

DecidedMay 26, 2000

Docket98-0394

StatusPublished

This text of 2000 WI 44 (State v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Miller, 2000 WI 44, 610 N.W.2d 484, 234 Wis. 2d 687, 2000 Wisc. LEXIS 224 (Wis. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

¶ 1. After examination of the record and the briefs of the parties, and after hearing oral argument, we conclude that the petition for review was improvidently granted. 1 Derek Miller, the petitioner, stipulated that he was a sexually violent person and raised issues about his placement. Because the statutes at issue have changed since the petitioner's case arose and the court of appeals has adequately addressed the issues raised by the parties, we conclude that this case does not meet our standards for review.

By the Court. — The review of the decision of the court of appeals is dismissed as improvidently granted.

¶ 2. DAVID T. PROSSER, J., did not participate.

1

State v. Miller, 229 Wis. 2d 567, 600 N.W.2d 224 (Ct. App. 1999).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

¶ 1. After examination of the record and the briefs of the parties, and after hearing oral argument, we conclude that the petition for review was improvidently granted. 1 Derek Miller, the petitioner, stipulated that he was a sexually violent person and raised issues about his placement. Because the statutes at issue have changed since the petitioner's case arose and the court of appeals has adequately addressed the issues raised by the parties, we conclude that this case does not meet our standards for review.

By the Court. — The review of the decision of the court of appeals is dismissed as improvidently granted.

¶ 2. DAVID T. PROSSER, J., did not participate.

1

State v. Miller, 229 Wis. 2d 567, 600 N.W.2d 224 (Ct. App. 1999).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2000 WI 44, 610 N.W.2d 484, 234 Wis. 2d 687, 2000 Wisc. LEXIS 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-miller-wis-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack