State v. Miller

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Miller

540 S.W.3d 889

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 6, 2018

DocketNo. ED 104809

StatusPublished

This text of 540 S.W.3d 889 (State v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Miller, 540 S.W.3d 889 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Rontese Miller ("Appellant") appeals from the trial court's judgment following a jury trial convicting him of second-degree robbery, in violation of Section 569.030 (RSMo. 2000 ). Appellant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to 30 years' imprisonment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Rontese Miller ("Appellant") appeals from the trial court's judgment following a jury trial convicting him of second-degree robbery, in violation of Section 569.030 (RSMo. 2000 ). Appellant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to 30 years' imprisonment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

540 S.W.3d 889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-miller-moctapp-2018.