State v. Miller

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Miller

444 S.W.3d 532, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 906, 2014 WL 4198085

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 26, 2014

DocketNo. ED 100239

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 444 S.W.3d 532 (State v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Miller, 444 S.W.3d 532, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 906, 2014 WL 4198085 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William S. Miller appeals from the judgment entered on his conviction for kidnapping, arguing there was insufficient evidence that his purpose in kidnapping was to terrorize the victim. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William S. Miller appeals from the judgment entered on his conviction for kidnapping, arguing there was insufficient evidence that his purpose in kidnapping was to terrorize the victim. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

444 S.W.3d 532, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 906, 2014 WL 4198085, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-miller-moctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack