State v. Miller

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Miller

617 A.2d 170, 224 Conn. 914, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 407

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided November 4, 1992·No. SC 14634·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The state of Connecticut’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 29 Conn. App. 207 (AC 10071), is granted, limited to the following question:

“In the circumstances of this case, did the warrant-less search of the defendant’s car at the West Hartford police station violate article first, § 7, of the Connecticut constitution?”

LeonF. Dalbec, Jr., assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Ronald T. Murphy, special public defender, in opposition. Decided November 4, 1992

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The state of Connecticut’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 29 Conn. App. 207 (AC 10071), is granted, limited to the following question:

“In the circumstances of this case, did the warrant-less search of the defendant’s car at the West Hartford police station violate article first, § 7, of the Connecticut constitution?”

LeonF. Dalbec, Jr., assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Ronald T. Murphy, special public defender, in opposition. Decided November 4, 1992

State v. Miller, 617 A.2d 170, 224 Conn. 914, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 407 (Colo. 1992).

Pincite

617 A.2d 170 (State v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related