State v. Miles

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Miles

982 P.2d 48, 160 Or. App. 647, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 820

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided May 19, 1999·No. 96-12-39390, 96-12-39389; CA A97726, A98081·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant Miles appeals from convictions for burglary in the first degree, ORS 164.225, and theft in the second degree, ORS 164.045. Defendant Clayburn appeals from convictions for burglary in the first degree, ORS 164.225, possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992, and theft in the second degree, ORS 164.045. The issues raised on appeal by defendants are the same issues raised and decided in State v. Crocker, 160 Or App 445, 982 P2d 45 (1999). We affirm. See id.; State v. Cruz-Aquirre, 158 Or App 15, 972 P2d 1206 (1999); State v. Fugate, 154 Or App 643, 963 P2d 686, on recons 156 Or App 609, 969 P2d 395 (1998), rev allowed 328 Or 275 (1999).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant Miles appeals from convictions for burglary in the first degree, ORS 164.225, and theft in the second degree, ORS 164.045. Defendant Clayburn appeals from convictions for burglary in the first degree, ORS 164.225, possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992, and theft in the second degree, ORS 164.045. The issues raised on appeal by defendants are the same issues raised and decided in State v. Crocker, 160 Or App 445, 982 P2d 45 (1999). We affirm. See id.; State v. Cruz-Aquirre, 158 Or App 15, 972 P2d 1206 (1999); State v. Fugate, 154 Or App 643, 963 P2d 686, on recons 156 Or App 609, 969 P2d 395 (1998), rev allowed 328 Or 275 (1999).

State v. Miles, 982 P.2d 48, 160 Or. App. 647, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 820 (Or. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

982 P.2d 48 (State v. Miles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related