State v. Miles
This text of 335 Mont. 20 (State v. Miles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On June 9, 2005, the defendant was sentenced to a commitment to the Department of Corrections for a term of two (2) years, for violation of the conditions of a deferred sentence, for the offense of Violation of Protective Order, a felony.
On March 6, 2006, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The defendant was present and was advised of his right to be represented by counsel. The state was not represented.
Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to continue his hearing to pursue any and all appeal avenues prior to his sentence review hearing.
Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the application for review of sentence shall be continued pending notification to the Sentence Review Division within sixty (60) days of the decision of a final appeal.
Done in open Court this 6 th day of March, 2006.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
335 Mont. 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-miles-mont-2006.