State v. MILENE

308 S.W.3d 788, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 557, 2010 WL 1752128
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 4, 2010·No. WD 70156·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*789 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Cynthia Milene challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support her convictions for possession of a controlled substance and making a false report. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the convictions.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. MILENE, 308 S.W.3d 788, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 557, 2010 WL 1752128 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

308 S.W.3d 788 (State v. MILENE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gash v. Director of Revenue
308 S.W.3d 788 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)