State v. Mikolinski

748 A.2d 299, 252 Conn. 949, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 115
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided March 22, 2000·No. SC 16275·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 252 (AC 17866), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant’s detention at a roadside sobriety checkpoint did not violate her rights under either article first, § 7, or article first, § 9, of the Connecticut constitution?”

SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Mikolinski, 748 A.2d 299, 252 Conn. 949, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 115 (Colo. 2000).

748 A.2d 299 (State v. Mikolinski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Mikolinski
775 A.2d 274 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2001)