State v. Mikolinski
748 A.2d 299, 252 Conn. 949, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 115
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 252 (AC 17866), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant’s detention at a roadside sobriety checkpoint did not violate her rights under either article first, § 7, or article first, § 9, of the Connecticut constitution?”
SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Mikolinski, 748 A.2d 299, 252 Conn. 949, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 115 (Colo. 2000).
748 A.2d 299 (State v. Mikolinski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Mikolinski
775 A.2d 274 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2001)