State v. Mike

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Mike

774 A.2d 140, 256 Conn. 920, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 212

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided May 30, 2001·No. SC 16532·Published

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 62 Conn. App. 907 (AC 20157), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court’s refusal to apply the exclusionary rule at the defendant’s violation of probation hearing did not violate article first, § 8, of the Connecticut constitution?”

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 62 Conn. App. 907 (AC 20157), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court’s refusal to apply the exclusionary rule at the defendant’s violation of probation hearing did not violate article first, § 8, of the Connecticut constitution?”

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

State v. Mike, 774 A.2d 140, 256 Conn. 920, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 212 (Colo. 2001).

Pincite

774 A.2d 140 (State v. Mike) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.