State v. Mihm
94 A. 789, 87 N.J.L. 332, 2 Gummere 332, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 231
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed upon the opinion filed in the case of State v. Sutton, ante p. 192.
[333]*333For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Trencitaed, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, Vredenbuegh, White, Teehune, Williams, JJ. 13.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Mihm, 94 A. 789, 87 N.J.L. 332, 2 Gummere 332, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 231 (N.J. 1915).
94 A. 789 (State v. Mihm) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.