State v. Mihm

94 A. 789, 87 N.J.L. 332, 2 Gummere 332, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 231
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 14, 1915
StatusPublished

This text of 94 A. 789 (State v. Mihm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Mihm, 94 A. 789, 87 N.J.L. 332, 2 Gummere 332, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 231 (N.J. 1915).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed upon the opinion filed in the case of State v. Sutton, ante p. 192.

[333]*333For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Trencitaed, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoh, Black, Vredenbuegh, White, Teehune, Williams, JJ. 13.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 A. 789, 87 N.J.L. 332, 2 Gummere 332, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mihm-nj-1915.